Response 351403804

Back to Response listing

Personal Information

What is your name?

Name
Brett Seriani

What is your organisation?

Organisation
Seriani Designs

Which best describes your industry sector?

Which best describes your industry sector?
Please select one item
Building Commercial
Building Residential
Building Commercial and Residential
Building and plumbing products
Building Certification/ Surveying
Architecture and design
Ticked Engineering
Plumbing
Compliance, testing and accreditation
Legal and Finance
Specialist - disability access
Specialist - energy efficiency
Specialist - fire safety
Specialist - health
Specialist - hydraulic/ plumbing
Student/ apprentices
Trades and other construction services
Education
Community and Non-Government organisations
Government
General Public
Other

Please select your State or Territory

State or Territory
Please select one item
ACT
NSW
NT
Qld
SA
Tas
Ticked Vic
WA

On whose behalf are you making this submission?

Please select one item
(Required)
Ticked I am making this submission on my own behalf
I am making this submission on behalf of a business
I am making this submission on behalf of an industry body
I am making this submission on behalf of a government agency

General Questions

Does the proposed NRF deliver an appropriate and proportionate response to BCR Recommendations 1 and 2?

Please select one item
Yes
Ticked No
Unsure
If No, please provide reasons and suggestions.
The NRF does not address all the Design Professionals who work in the Industry, and their contribution to the the Design and Building Process.

The NRF needs to expand and adequately define the roles of:
1. Design Professions:
Architects
Building Designers
Interior Designers
Drafters

2. Engineering Professions: (As per Engineers Australia, Washington Accord & Sydney Accord Definitions)
Engineers
Technologists
Associates
Drafters

Will the NRF, if implemented, enhance confidence in the building industry by ensuring that key practitioners in the building process are registered?

Please select one item
Yes
Ticked No
Unsure
If No, please provide reasons and suggestions.
Registration does not imply competency within the Architecture, Design, or Engineering professions.

Do you foresee any risks in implementing this proposal, noting that the states and territories are responsible for implementation of the NRF?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No
Unsure
Please explain your reasoning.
A single framework which covers all working Professionals in the Building Industry needs to be established. It needs to recognise all those who are working in the industry, and enable them within their skills and competencies.

Simply put, an Architect or Building Designer or Engineer or Technologist or Associate, all work within the same NCC, BCA, and Australian Standards. There should be no need for State or Territory based registration in addition to a National Registration Framework. Adding in additional layers of regulation and registration adds in confusion to the general public, as they only see the the title of the Professional they are working with, and not where or which State or Territory they are registered.

In the eyes of the public...
An Architect is an Architect, in NSW, ACT, VIC, QLD, WA, SA, TAS ,and NT.
An Engineer is an Engineer, in NSW, ACT, VIC, QLD, WA, SA, TAS ,and NT.
A Building Designer is an Building Designer, in NSW, ACT, VIC, QLD, WA, SA, TAS ,and NT.

The Risk is adding further regulation to an already confusing industry, of which will degrade confidence to the general public.

Do you think the proposed NRF will improve compliance with the NCC?

Please select one item
Yes
Ticked No
Unsure
Please explain your reasoning.
Registration does not imply competence. There are several Registered Professionals who have met the entry requirements qualifications to be registered, but have no competence or skills in order to function within their profession.

NRF Discipline Specific Comments

Please provide your comments below.

Your comment relates to:
Please select one item
(Required)
Building design
Energy efficiency design
Disability access design
Geotechnical design
Ticked Structural design
Electrical design
Mechanical design
Hydraulic design
Plumbing design
Fire safety design
Fire systems design
Façade design
Building
Fire systems installation
Plumbing
Building surveying
Fire systems inspection
Project management
Registration levels
Structural Design should be further divided into the following Professionals:

Chartered Engineering Professionals:
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Chartered-Engineer

Structural Design - Level 1
1. Chartered Professional Engineer (CPEng)
2. Professional Engineer (PEng)
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Professional-Engineer

Structural Design - Level 2
3. Chartered Engineering Technologist (CEngT)
4. Engineering Technologist (EngT)
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Engineering-Technologist

Structural Design - Level 3
5. Chartered Engineering Associate (CEngA)
6. Engineering Associate (EngA)
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Engineering-Associate
Descriptions/definitions
Chartered Engineering Professionals:
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Chartered-Engineer

Structural Design - Level 1
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Professional-Engineer

Structural Design - Level 2
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Engineering-Technologist

Structural Design - Level 3
https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Individuals/Engineering-Associate
Scope of work
Structural Design - Level 1
Structural Engineering Design work, all NCC building Classes or size - performance and DTS.

Structural Design - Level 2
Structural Engineering Design work for NCC Class 1 and 10 buildings - performance and DTS.
Structural Engineering Design work for NCC Class 2 to 9 buildings - performance and DTS to a maximum of three storeys above a storey used for parking vehicles but not including Type A construction other than for NCC Class 2, 3, or 9 buildings.

Structural Design - Level 3
Structural Engineering Design work for NCC Class 1 and 10 buildings - performance and DTS.
Structural Engineering Design work for NCC Class 2 to 9 buildings - performance and DTS with a gross floor area of not more than 2000m², but not including Type A or Type B construction.
Qualification requirements
Structural Design - Level 1
AQF Level 7 or Washington Accord Equivalent + NCC Specific Training

Structural Design - Level 2
AQF Level 6 or Sydney Accord Equivalent + NCC Specific Training

Structural Design - Level 3
AQF Level 5 or Sydney Accord Equivalent + NCC Specific Training
Experience requirements
Structural Design - Level 1
Chartered Professional Engineer (CPEng) + 3 years experience
Professional Engineer (PEng) + 5 years experience

Structural Design - Level 2
Chartered Engineering Technologist (CEngT) + 3 years experience
Engineering Technologist (EngT) + 5 years experience

Structural Design - Level 3
Chartered Engineering Associate (CEngA) + 3 years experience
Engineering Associate (EngA) + 5 years experience
Any other comments for this discipline
This framework can be adopted for all other Engineering Disciplines:
- Geotechnical
- Civil
- Electrical
- Mechanical
- Fire

Would you like to comment on another discipline?

Please select one item
(Required)
Yes
Ticked No

Other Comments

The ABCB is specifically interested in your comments on the registration levels for building surveyors. Do you agree with the criteria used to distinguish between with the two levels of registration for building surveyors and does it adequately accommodate the different levels of risk?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No
Unsure