We Asked, You Said, We Did

We asked for your feedback on the proposed principles and parameters of a Building Product Registration Scheme between 4 September 2024 and 3 October 2024.

More than 100 submissions were received. There were many voices and views shared on the proposal, and a range of issues were raised in feedback. Some of the common themes we heard include:

• that this process should not be rushed. There was a strong view that we need to ensure that relevant issues are considered, including implementation and enforcement,
• existing industry and government schemes should be recognised, and it will be important to consider how to achieve mandatory acceptance of these schemes to give industry greater confidence and certainty,
• there is broad support for taking action and many parts of industry are willing to assist in future work,
• integration with common design and site management software would allow seamless adoption of better product information, and
• we should avoid using the term ‘Scheme’ unless we mean to have the current accepted meaning (in relation to existing product schemes). We are grateful for this feedback, and we are likely to use the word ‘framework’ in any future work.

The ABCB has considered your feedback in preparing our advice to Building Ministers.

A Consultation Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) was released for public comment between 20 September to 7 November 2021.

Over 100 submissions were received. All submissions were taken into consideration by the ABCB.

The Decision RIS was finalised taking account of the feedback on the Consultation RIS where appropriate. This was used as one input into the decision by Ministers to include the new residential energy efficiency provisions into NCC 2022.

The Building Confidence Report (BCR) Implementation Team asked for your feedback on installation, testing and certification of fire safety systems to improve building outcomes and compliance with the National Construction Code.

We received 61 responses. Responses were received from industry associations, businesses, governments, educational institutions and individuals. Responses were positive and supportive of a nationally consistent approach to  installation, testing and certification of fire safety systems. There was strong support to ensure that work is only undertaken by registered practitioners.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a model guide on Fire safety systems. The model guide was endorsed by Building Ministers and is available for state and territory consideration and implementation.

We asked for your input to a model guide on experience needed for building surveyor registration. The guide aims to help people obtain and prove they have experience of sufficient depth and breadth to be registered as a building surveyor. There is also a section for supervisors.

You provided many good suggestions to improve the model guide. Views varied on how may experience reports were sufficient to prove experience, with suggestions ranging from none to around 50. Almost all submissions advised that a minimum number of work examples should not be required.  

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a model guide on Evidence of experience for building surveyor registration. The model guide was endorsed by Building Ministers for state and territory consideration and implementation. 

We asked for your input on how to improve fire authority invoment in the building design process in response to Recommendation 8 of the Building Confidence Report. We proposed a model code of conduct and model guidance.  

You provided valuable information on the limitations and barriers affecting fire authority involvement and made practical suggestions to address these through the proposed code of conduct for fire safety engineers and model guidance on the design process.  

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to refine the Code of conduct for fire safety engineers, and improve the model guidance on Fire authorities in the building design process.

The code and model guidance have been endorsed by Building Ministers for state and territory consideration and implementation. 

We sought your views on what was needed to provide more certainty in compliance pathways for building products; reducing the cost of compliance and the likelihood of defects. 

We received 47 responses. Responses supported the need for greater controls on the supply of building products, clearer rules on their appropriate use in building projects and stronger enforcement. You provided advice on how this can work better within the existing frameworks and through the product conformance infrastructure and traceability standards.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a National Building Product Assurance Framework.

The national framework was endorsed by Building Ministers and is available for state and territory consideration and implementation.

We sought your views on options to improve integrity in the building approvals process and strengthen a building surveyor’s role in enforcement when they are undertaking a statutory function.

We received 53 responses. There was general support for the majority of proposals which aimed to address the matters described in the Building Confidence Report (BCR). These included matters such as:

• Documenting the appointment and termination of a building surveyor
• Ensuring key information is provided to relevant parties
• Having necessary conflict of interest controls, and
• Having appropriate enforcement powers for building surveyors.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a model guide on Building surveyor integrity and their role in enforcement.

The model guide was endorsed by Building Ministers and is available for state and territory consideration and implementation.

A Consultation RIS was released for public comment between 7 December 2020 to 1 March 2021.

40 submissions were received. All submissions were taken into consideration by the ABCB in preparing a Decision RIS, which represents one input into the decision making process of the Board.

The ABCB determined to limit the lead content of plumbing products in contact with drinking water to 0.25% (Option 2) as its preferred option, with this having been reflected in the public comment draft of NCC 2022.

The Building Confidence Report (BCR) Implementation Team asked for your feedback on Mandatory Inspections to improve building outcomes and compliance with the National Construction Code.

We received 68 responses. Responses were received from industry associations, businesses, governments, educational institutions and individuals. Overall, there was strong support for governments nominating minimum mandatory inspections for both residential and commercial construction. There was also support to expand the minimum inspection types to accommodate regulatory and societal advances, and the way in which buildings are constructed.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a model guide on Mandatory inspections.

The model guide was endorsed by Building Ministers and is available for state and territory consideration and implementation.

We sought your views on how to improve the standard and compliance of project documentation as part of the building approval application process and for design variations made either during construction or in constructed building work.

We received 48 responses, providing feedback on what should be the appropriate rules on:

• documentation requirements
• documentation and approval for variations
• record of Performance Solutions on the Occupancy Approval
• building surveyor assessment, and
• implementation. 

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a model guide on Design acceptance.

The model guide was endorsed by Building Ministers and is available for state and territory consideration and implementation.

The Building Confidence Report (BCR) Implementation Team asked for your feedback on Independent Third Party Review (ITPR) of building designs to improve building outcomes and compliance with the National Construction Code.

We received 58 responses. Responses were received from industry associations, businesses, governments, educational institutions and individuals. Responses were positive and supportive of a nationally consistent approach to ITPR for structural and fire safety designs for high risk buildings. There was strong support to ensure the process was risk based and that ITPR is undertaken by an independent, competent and registered practitioner.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform model guidance on Independent third party review.

The model guide was endorsed by Building Ministers and is available for state and territory consideration and implementation.

We asked for your input to a model guidance on a framework for reporting auditing and compliance activities of building regulators. 

You provided overwhelming support for a reporting framework, and made many good suggestions to improve the model guidance. 

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a model guidance on Auditing and compliance reporting. The model guidance has been endorsed by Building Ministers for state and territory consideration and implementation. 

We sought your views on a definition to identify buildings with increased likelihood of non-compliance, and therefore consequences for occupants.

You said the definition needed to be simplified and amended so that it could be understood and implemented with confidence.

To make the definition clearer, we:

• consolidated and replaced confusing criteria
• simplified the presentation, and
• used terminology from the NCC. 

See the What happens next section at the bottom of this page for more information.   

The Building Confidence Report (BCR) Implementation Team asked for your feedback on the registration of building practitioners involved in the design, construction and maintenance of buildings, and that each jurisdiction prescribes consistent registration requirements covering knowledge of the National Construction Code, competency and experience, and integrity.

We received 755 responses. Responses were positive and supportive of a nationally consistent approach to registration. Responses were received from industry associations, businesses, governments, educational institutions and individuals. Further targeted consultations were held with selected industry associations to finalise the details in the National Registration Framework, including architects, building designers and plumbers.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform a National Registration Framework for building practitioners.

The national framework was endorsed by Building Ministers and is available for state and territory consideration and implementation.

The Building Confidence Report (BCR) Implementation Team asked for your feedback about how:

• reporting of auditing information could impact compliance with the National Construction Code, State and Territory legislation and Australian Standards;
• how and when auditing information should be reported; and
• your perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of such reporting.

We received 199 responses. Responses were positive about the impacts of reporting on auditing, with almost all respondents expressing that reporting on auditing would benefit industry, building owners, tenants and users. Two thirds of respondents expressed an interest in more, and more frequent, engagement by building regulators about auditing, in addition to formal reporting.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to inform the draft Auditing and Compliance Publication Framework, which was out for consultation from November 2020 - January 2021.

An analysis of this feedback, titled Auditing and compliance - Supplementary information, was published in December 2021.  

In March 2020, the Building Confidence Report (BCR) Implementation Team released a discussion paper asking for feedback on a draft model Code of conduct for building surveyors.

The Team received 44 responses to the discussion paper, which indicated you supported a national code of conduct for building surveyors. However, you suggested some changes, asked for clarifications and suggested additional obligations.

The BCR Implementation Team used your feedback to finalise a model Code of conduct for building surveyors. The model code has been endorsed by Building Ministers for state and territory consideration and implementation. 

We asked for your feedback about a proposal to ensure that all building and plumbing Performance Solutions are developed and documented using an appropriate, nationally-consistent process by mandating the process contained in the ABCB’s ‘Development of Performance Solutions’ guideline.

We received 51 responses to the proposal.

Some of you raised concerns that the process would be too onerous for simple Performance Solutions, and that the problem lies with poor enforcement rather than poor regulation. Many believed the number of Performance Solutions used in commercial buildings was under estimated in the Consultation RIS. 

We clarified the rigour of the proposed process was designed to be commensurate with the complexity of the solution. We assessed the potential for better building outcomes and higher confidence in the building regulatory system under higher rates of use of Performance Solutions and contemporary examples of failure.

For feedback about supporting practitioners to use the FSVM to inform our approach to future education needs.

We received 123 responses, almost half having watched the FSVM webinar. Here is some feedback about what you want:

• More and simpler guidance in different online formats.
• Cover applying the FSVM and include worked examples and case studies.
• Links to training.
• More opportunities to ask questions during webinars.

We are scoping additional materials and training to support the FSVM. From early 2020, we are looking to work with industry to provide:

• More technical advice to use the FSVM in different formats (i.e. online resources, webinar)
• Frequently asked questions and answers about the FSVM
• Articles about the FSVM.

For your comments on approach and possible technical changes to the energy efficiency provisions for NCC 2022.

You raised several important issues about what was proposed in the Scoping Study. These covered matters of public policy, current situation, practitioner concerns, and technical aspects of the proposed changes for residential and commercial energy efficiency.

We have documented and responded to as many of your concerns as possible within this Outcomes Report. We will now use these insights to inform the next steps in the ABCB’s Energy efficiency project.