NCC 2019 Amendment 1
Please provide your recommended change below.
Your comment relates to:
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Process for developing Performance Solutions
Radio button:
Unticked
Early childhood centres
Radio button:
Unticked
Spec C1.1 Class 2 and 3 concessions
Radio button:
Unticked
Definition: Building complexity
Radio button:
Unticked
Marking specification for ACPs
Recommended change to draft:
The inclusion of a precise Performance Solution methodology within the BCA is supported in principle but is noted to have significant productivity impacts that should be considered in detail. A regulatory impact statement should be prepared analysing impact/benefit on a range of Performance Solutions including minor departures. In addition, A2.2 should be coupled with a simpler process for BCA verification methods or Codemark type solutions.
Comment/reason for change:
A2.2(4) doesn’t however distinguish between complex and minor Performance Solutions. Example of minor Performance Solutions include:
- Codemark certificates such as termite barriers
- BCA conflicts such as primary school lower handrail at landings vs barrier climbability
The PBDB requirements will double the handling time on all Performance Solutions including minor departures.
- Codemark certificates such as termite barriers
- BCA conflicts such as primary school lower handrail at landings vs barrier climbability
The PBDB requirements will double the handling time on all Performance Solutions including minor departures.
NCC 2019 Amendment 1
Please provide your recommended change below.
Your comment relates to:
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Process for developing Performance Solutions
Radio button:
Unticked
Early childhood centres
Radio button:
Unticked
Spec C1.1 Class 2 and 3 concessions
Radio button:
Ticked
Definition: Building complexity
Radio button:
Unticked
Marking specification for ACPs
Recommended change to draft:
The definition is being proposed without any detail on its intended implementation. Any public consultation is premature. Future public consultation should be encouraged when the public have enough information about how the definition will be used to comment in an informed way.
Comment/reason for change:
Unable to provided comment without details of the definitions intended application.
NCC 2019 Amendment 1
Please provide your recommended change below.
Your comment relates to:
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Process for developing Performance Solutions
Radio button:
Ticked
Early childhood centres
Radio button:
Unticked
Spec C1.1 Class 2 and 3 concessions
Radio button:
Unticked
Definition: Building complexity
Radio button:
Unticked
Marking specification for ACPs
Recommended change to draft:
The child care fire safety updates are much needed but a better way to address in the short-term could be through a national technical advisory note leaning on E2.3 and the Guide. This would ensure a fire safety engineer is engaged when a child care centre is above ground. Any changes should be supported by a regulatory impact statement.
C2.5 and D1.11 appear clunky and may result in confusion. The horizontal exit requirements of C2.5 and D1.11 should be combined/streamlined if possible to better convey the intent of the clauses.
Suggest any changes to E1.5 be part of the broader ABCB Holistic Fire Safety Project.
Spec E1.5 Clause 2(c) is 85 words in one sentence. Suggest this be revisited for readability.
C2.5 and D1.11 appear clunky and may result in confusion. The horizontal exit requirements of C2.5 and D1.11 should be combined/streamlined if possible to better convey the intent of the clauses.
Suggest any changes to E1.5 be part of the broader ABCB Holistic Fire Safety Project.
Spec E1.5 Clause 2(c) is 85 words in one sentence. Suggest this be revisited for readability.
Comment/reason for change:
Regarding horizontal exits:
- C2.5 requires at least 2 horizontal exits
- D1.11(a) Doesn’t allow horizontal exits to be counted as required exits
- D1.11(c) Allows horizontal exits to be not more than 2/3 the required exits
The above requirements are confusing and may be a conflict.
- C2.5 requires at least 2 horizontal exits
- D1.11(a) Doesn’t allow horizontal exits to be counted as required exits
- D1.11(c) Allows horizontal exits to be not more than 2/3 the required exits
The above requirements are confusing and may be a conflict.